3 ms·

And it's still rather far from being mature. Debian squeeze x64 user of Chrome with nvidia-* 260.19.44-1 drivers here. For instance go to: http://flashbuilde

by przemoc 15y ago

And it's still rather far from being mature. Debian squeeze x64 user of Chrome with nvidia-* 260.19.44-1 drivers here. For instance go to: http://flashbuilder.eu/flash-player-version.html http://flashbuilder.eu/flash-player-version.html 1. RBM on flash content, Settings. Now try to set anything with mouse (i.e. w/o using keyboard, especially Tab + Space). 2. RBM on flash content, Zoom in. How much of the view has been redrawn? Now let's go to vimeo: http://vimeo.com/27870776 http://vimeo.com/27870776 And HD video still doesn't play smoothly and it's sometimes off-sync. My desktop (http://wiki.przemoc.net/about/my_hardware http://wiki.przemoc.net/about/my_hardware) surely isn't top-notch one, but outside of Flash world I can use it to watch 1080p50p video material, so something is wrong with Flash, and it's even worse in Linux department, unfortunately.

morsch 15y ago
All of these things (1. + 2. + HD video) have been working for me for a long time. YouTube 1080p content works fine, though I kind of doubt it's using VDPAU, so it's bound to hit the CPU (4x 1.9GHz i5, hardly cutting edge) fairly hard. I'm using the 64bit flashplayer 11 from the sevenmachines ppa. Are you using Chrome or Chromium? Chrome comes with its own flash version.
- przemoc 15y ago
  I use a beta version of Google Chrome (latest 15.0.874.81 beta) from official repo (deb http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main). I remember it was shipped with Flash, but it worked not as good as I would like it to, so I was using 64-bit betas (not great either, to be honest), IIRC by disabling Chrome's own Flash in about:plugins. Now looking there I see only one Flash plugin, which is the one installed in my system (Location: /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so). So even if Chrome's custom Flash is better, as you imply, dunno how to turn it on for a test ride now. Also dpkg --contents google-chrome-beta_15.0.874.81-r103858_amd64.deb | grep -i fl reveals nothing.
  - morsch 15y ago
    I didn't mean to imply that Chrome's custom Flash is better. I have no idea if it is since I run Firefox (typically) and Chromium (rarely). Like I said, I use the 64bit Flash player from the sevenmachines ppa (Ubuntu 11.04). https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/flash https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/flash
    - evmar 15y ago
      Chrome's custom Flash is better, because the Chrome generic plugin code is not very good. And that is due to [the plugin API being very complicated and full of bugs -- http://neugierig.org/software/chromium/notes/2009/05/plugins-diagram.html http://neugierig.org/software/chromium/notes/2009/05/plugins... .

by przemoc 15y ago

morsch 15y ago

All of these things (1. + 2. + HD video) have been working for me for a long time. YouTube 1080p content works fine, though I kind of doubt it's using VDPAU, so it's bound to hit the CPU (4x 1.9GHz i5, hardly cutting edge) fairly hard. I'm using the 64bit flashplayer 11 from the sevenmachines ppa. Are you using Chrome or Chromium? Chrome comes with its own flash version.

przemoc 15y ago
I use a beta version of Google Chrome (latest 15.0.874.81 beta) from official repo (deb http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main). I remember it was shipped with Flash, but it worked not as good as I would like it to, so I was using 64-bit betas (not great either, to be honest), IIRC by disabling Chrome's own Flash in about:plugins. Now looking there I see only one Flash plugin, which is the one installed in my system (Location: /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so). So even if Chrome's custom Flash is better, as you imply, dunno how to turn it on for a test ride now. Also dpkg --contents google-chrome-beta_15.0.874.81-r103858_amd64.deb | grep -i fl reveals nothing.
- morsch 15y ago
  I didn't mean to imply that Chrome's custom Flash is better. I have no idea if it is since I run Firefox (typically) and Chromium (rarely). Like I said, I use the 64bit Flash player from the sevenmachines ppa (Ubuntu 11.04). https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/flash https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/flash
  - evmar 15y ago
    Chrome's custom Flash is better, because the Chrome generic plugin code is not very good. And that is due to [the plugin API being very complicated and full of bugs -- http://neugierig.org/software/chromium/notes/2009/05/plugins-diagram.html http://neugierig.org/software/chromium/notes/2009/05/plugins... .