> It may be understood by the recipients that they need to cut costs wherever possible. Except executive compensation, I suppose. It's also not an isolated ev

> It may be understood by the recipients that they need to cut costs wherever possible. Except executive compensation, I suppose. It's also not an isolated event, just another moment in a trend of big corporate entities pushing wages in only one direction, down. No matter how you word it, it's starting to look a lot like: "We need to lower wages because no one can afford anything anymore because no one is paying high enough wages".