4 ms·

Can you elaborate? Especially about the first part

• smoldesu 5y ago
  They're probably referring to the functional regressions it made with it's first official release, and how it furthers the idea of GNOME/GTK lock-in. libadwaita has made it extremely difficult to package cross-platform desktop apps, especially while appearing native on different desktops (eg. adopting the native Breeze look on KDE while retaining the native Adwaita look on GNOME). The lack of this functionality at launch (and subsequent empty promises of a replacement) have rightfully left a bad taste in some people's mouth, particularly now that much of the GNOME leadership denies that this is a problem in the first place.
• Gualdrapo 5y ago
  I don't think adwaita is that bad, but rather feel like they _yet_ have to polish some small details. Like the interline spacing on things, sometimes it feels inconsistent. KDE menus, for example, have a nice spacing - but GTK ones feel cramped. And those submenus that they place on things like the top-right menu on the panel have different line heights. Some other third party apps, for example that mail client I tried the other day (it wasn't evolution, but I can't remember its name) had serious layout issues. libadwaita was supposed to fix those inconsistencies and make devs lifes happier, but... And speaking of buttons and top right corners, I will never, ever get why they place the open/save/select dialog buttons in the top right corner of the dialog. Where you are used to find the 'close' button. Why?