> You have smuggled in a LOT of things that are not empirical in your response. Those are mental models that are useful to me but unfortunately I'm not master

> You have smuggled in a LOT of things that are not empirical in your response. Those are mental models that are useful to me but unfortunately I'm not master at using them. And what is more they are inherently wrong (because they are models and not the real thing - putting aside if anything is real). I do not believe in them more than I need to. But they are the only way that we can communicate on high level - by establishing common model and that talking about its properties. And then we can empirically test if they really behave as we believe (if we want to, otherwise we can just leave it be and use it as toys and as a way to spend our time waiting for nothingness to take us back). > Please forgive my inability to speak more clearly. Likewise - as You may have guessed english is not my native language and those concepts that I speak about are not well developed in my mind - they are merly my intuitions (by which I openly admin that I use things that are not empirically proven - but only because that is the only way that our faulty mind can work - by substituting reality with simplified erroneous abstractions that sometimes work). >I could go on, but I have to get back to work Wish You a pleasant work! And thank You for good conversation.