3 ms·
Shame on Chest Magazine's editors for not catching this either way. Most likely, one report-writer didn't understand that these were MATCHED consecutive patien
by Khelavaster 5y ago
Shame on Chest Magazine's editors for not catching this either way.
Most likely, one report-writer didn't understand that these were MATCHED consecutive patients. The data is so clearly matched, it's hard to believe it's fraudulent.
- ravel-bar-foo 5y agoThis is addressed by the author. Even if matched, these are impressively matched datasets. To the extent that it is questionable the hospital had the number of potential study participants to match them this well.