3 ms·
I can't believe the number of entitled posts here. Do people here think that Gitlab SaaS doesn't have an operation cost (in servers, development, support, etc)?
by whoisjuan 5y ago
I can't believe the number of entitled posts here. Do people here think that Gitlab SaaS doesn't have an operation cost (in servers, development, support, etc)?
Perhaps people need to start re-evaluating what "free" means in the context of a cloud offering. "Free" is a marketing strategy, not a charitable act.
In the case of Gitlab there's nothing preventing you from using the self-managed free tier which will effectively remove this limit, but guess what? Running it on your own will also have a cost for you. The same way it does for Gitlab when they give it for free through Gitlab.com
- PaywallBuster 5y agoNot entitlement Gitlab used to have a basic free tier and a 5$ tier which was accessible Since they will heavily restrict the free tier, and the 5$ plan was moved to 20$, many organizations have a serious financial decision to make and all the fans of Gitlab, myself included, will have to consider options and the other problem is pricing/per seat billing, is difficult for everyone, of course. But surely there's plenty of organizations which are probably a lot cheaper for Gitlab to keep as users than others depending on feature usage.
- benatkin 5y agoI read every single top-level comment, and not a single one seems "entitled" to me.
- Dayshine 5y agoI used to run Jira Server myself for a hobby project, I paid $10 for the 10 user version. I guess I might have been able to stretch to $50 out of my personal funds. Guess what? They dropped support and the suggested replacement product costs thousands per year. Am I entitled in that case too? Small non-commercial projects get stepped on all the time despite contributing most of the important software in the world. GitLab recently upped their pricing from $5/m to $20/m as well, so even paying members got a huge price increase.