3 ms·
You have to launder it like the article mentioned, it just glossed over that completely as its about the OPSEC. Its still better if you already have a lucrativ
by vmception 5y ago
You have to launder it like the article mentioned, it just glossed over that completely as its about the OPSEC.
Its still better if you already have a lucrative clean-money life, which means it is easier to quickly intermingle uncleaned money into it.
- toss1 5y ago. . . and of course, if you already have a lucrative clean-money life, there's not much point to risking it all to get involved in dirty money activities It seems the best way to do it would be to be sponsored by the FBI or whatever in your country - use your expertise to setup a honeypot system with their prior knowledge and you'll feed them data when it is setup... they get info feed to collar criminals, no cost to their budget, are they going to care if you make your cut along the way? [note the "It seems" — I have zero experience with what the FBI may or may not require for such an operation]
- vmception 5y agoRight. Part of the goal of reducing corruption is having alternative behaviors that are more attractive But in any case there are lots of useful laundering techniques that can pass scrutiny Just wait for the next darknet pastebin to have that debate
- philwelch 5y agoThere’s nothing stopping the feds from double crossing you though. You could be the leader of a sovereign country and they will literally invade your country just to arrest you. That’s how they did Noriega.
- hulitu 5y agoSome countries are sovereign only in theory.