4 ms·
That's worse because now you have to find the innermost function and then walk back outwards. It gets especially ugly when the calls require other parameters
by ziml77 5y ago
That's worse because now you have to find the innermost function and then walk back outwards. It gets especially ugly when the calls require other parameters
let x = anotherThing(
somethingElse(
something(
x, y, z
), 1, 2, 3
), "a", "b", "c"
);
Or maybe this looks cleaner?
let x = anotherThing(
somethingElse(
something(x, y, z),
1, 2, 3
),
"a", "b", "c"
);
Neither is easy to follow.
- pintxo 5y agoI take you are no big fan of Lisp? /s Well, actually I agree with you - sometimes. I have actually written helper functions to get similar pipeline processing capabilities in js. function pipe(...args) { return args.reduce((x, fn) => fn(x), null); } pipe( () => 2, (x) => 7*x, console.log )