3 ms·
>So the article mentions NuScale, which are planning to build a couple of test reactors in 2030, but fails to mention Rosatom modular reactors which are decades
by adamsmith143 5y ago
>So the article mentions NuScale, which are planning to build a couple of test reactors in 2030, but fails to mention Rosatom modular reactors which are decades ahead and ready to go.
Is this a joke? How much is KGB paying you lmao.
- ComradePhil 5y agoNothing... as opposed to the large sum of money NuScale must have spent to get this article on the economist: http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html
- adamsmith143 5y agoYou understand that given current geopolitics that a Russian Nuke company is a complete non option for most of the world right?
- ComradePhil 5y agoIf you are discussing technological progress, there is absolutely no reason to not discuss the industry leaders regardless of their political standing at the time... unless of course you have no intention to write about the technology itself... you're merely using that plot as a guise to sneak in a promotion for one specific company which is a decade behind a company actually ready to roll out today. > a complete non option for most of the world right? India and China are perfectly happy to... and parts of middle east and some of Africa. That's almost half of the world population. What is "most of the world" to you?