3 ms·
I didn't say it does not exist, I said it does not work as a justification for actions that infringe on rights.
by mannykannot 5y ago
I didn't say it does not exist, I said it does not work as a justification for actions that infringe on rights.
- kube-system 5y agoSure, especially when we’re talking about rights that are almost universally agreed upon. But it could be a good justification for something like “the right to talk to customer support for Candy Crush”. The OP didn’t specify which companies he was trying to contact.
- mannykannot 5y agoIt was the originator of this thread (endsleigh) who framed the issue in terms of rights and their value. I am pointing out that this is not a useful way to look at it. Here, you are asking, in effect, whether a Candy Crush player has any such right in the first place, and I think it is completely reasonable to say they do not in such trivial matters. As I mentioned in my original post, I am mainly concerned with third parties, several of whom have shown up in the broader discussion, but customers and ex-customers could have reasonable issues with retroactive policy changes to issues such as privacy.