3 ms·
So, there's no objective artistic explanation for Selena Gomez; and all orchestral music played in a hall is objectively 'art'?
by IndySun 5y ago
So, there's no objective artistic explanation for Selena Gomez; and all orchestral music played in a hall is objectively 'art'?
- analog31 5y agoThere are layers of objective and subjective factors. "What is art" is its own beast. How a particular style of interpretation is chosen, is subjective. Once that style is chosen, the performance can be assessed against many objective standards, such as whether they followed their own stylistic choices correctly, etc.
- IndySun 5y agoI'm arguing that the subjective part of art is far less powerful than the objective, almost to the point it recedes from view. You disagree? Strictly speaking, all 'art' is subjective. Or, even stricter speaking, anything at all for which subjective outweighs objective becomes more or less 'subjective', ergo, all art is subjective. Perhaps you might argue, receded from view but still significant, is that fair?