3 ms·
Archetypal mad scientists aren't comic book megalomaniacs, but are sincerely touched by the majesty of creation. Feynman was one. Their electric enthusiasm an
by nonrandomstring 5y ago
Archetypal mad scientists aren't comic book megalomaniacs, but are
sincerely touched by the majesty of creation. Feynman was one. Their
electric enthusiasm and sheer joy is infectious. I can remember at
least two or three teachers who had that glint in their eyes and I owe
a huge debt to them for passing on the spark. We used to have a lot
more "celebrity" scientists. In the UK we still have starry eyed
"billions and billions" Brian Cox. Back in the days of TV we had David
Bellamy (Botanist) and Johnny Ball (mathematician). The establishment
finds it hard to "manage" these people, so Bellamy was edged out for
his non-conventional take on climate, and Ball was ousted for his
passionate critique of declining education. The Aussies had Julius
Sumner-Miller, who seemed like a proper Doc Brown fruit-bat.