> It's about having a track record of charging for closed source additions to your own open source software platform This is completely false. In fact, it has

> It's about having a track record of charging for closed source additions to your own open source software platform This is completely false. In fact, it has been rather the opposite. Thanks to Quiver I did improved a lot of things on the open-source GraphQL-core that benefited the whole community. Quiver was built as a completely new product, and to be crystal clear: it never took any open-source bits out of Graphene or GraphQL-core. Basically, anything that was open-source did continue being open-source. That's as true for Graphene as it is for Wasmer. I'm genuinely curious. On which ground you based your allegations?