4 ms·

Do you have data to backup those assertions about productivity? My findings suggest the US to be on par with Germany on PPP terms, ranked 6th overall. When meas

Do you have data to backup those assertions about productivity? My findings suggest the US to be on par with Germany on PPP terms, ranked 6th overall. When measuring productivity on a per hour basis the US is in the top 3. The statistics I’m reading from WB, Oced, CB, don’t seem to backup what you’re saying, at all. New business open soared to a historical record high in 2021. Right now, it’s difficult for many, but this time of uncertainty is not any worse than crisis’ in the past. “Confusion & feeling lost”…pretty anecdotal, don’t you think? My generation felt the same way too in the early 2000’s. My parents as well in the 70’s. How does that statement hold any weight at all? I will agree though that this generation is undergoing a mental health crisis. They are also the first generation to really be immersed by and grow up with social media. Were have you been? Lol. The rust belt has been the ‘rust belt’ since the 1980s. The rust belt, namely Detroit, Ohio , Pittsburg, Cleveland, have received quite a bit of development over the last decade. I honestly believe these areas will see even more investment and growth given the climate crisis, growing investment and population. I don’t know why people paint the US as all doom and gloom. Out of my friend group, 2/5 are doing better, 2/5 are doing about the same, 1/5 is doing worse. With all do respect, I feel like you pulled much of what you said out of thin air. OCED data on productivity: https://data.oecd.org/lprdty/gdp-per-hour-worked.htm https://data.oecd.org/lprdty/gdp-per-hour-worked.htm FDI trends in the rust belt: https://www.fdiintelligence.com/article/77298 https://www.fdiintelligence.com/article/77298 Business opens: https://www.npr.org/2022/01/12/1072057249/new-business-applications-record-high-great-resignation-pandemic-entrepreneur https://www.npr.org/2022/01/12/1072057249/new-business-appli...

pphysch 5y ago
GDP(PPP) simply isn't an accurate measure of real economic productivity, of producing real things that satisfy various human needs. Despite being the #1 GDP, America has an unbelievably huge trade deficit, unlike Germany and China which have substantial surpluses. This is because American GDP is massively inflated by unproductive/destructive sectors like FIRE and military. For example, how does "imputed rent" have anything to do with economic productivity?
- trevorboaconstr 5y ago
  So, you’re saying, you have a better and most trusted method of measuring productivity, than the CB, WTO, WB, and OCED. Would you let me know what metric you use, then? Also, every legitimate economist states that measuring trade policy by the size of the goods deficit is probably not a passing grade in a basic economics class. Do you have any clue what you’re talking about? “Deficit” in the term “trade deficit” is not analogous to a deficit in personal or business finance. Trade deficits are always offset by capital inflows. A trade deficit with a financial account surplus does not necessarily mean that the U.S. is over-consuming in the present and under-investing for the future. When a trade deficit’s offsetting inflow of foreign capital goes toward government debt, it increases U.S. productivity by freeing capital for private investment. A country like the U.S. runs an annual trade deficit with a partner country when Americans buy more goods and services from the partner than they sell to it. As a result, money flows out of the U.S. to the country, which sounds bad. But that’s not the end of the story. Those foreigners with the trade surplus – let’s say in China – now have extra saving that needs to be put to work. A lack of productive investment opportunities at home means they look to other countries – like the U.S. – to profitably use their money. In other words, money flowing out to pay for imports flows back in to help pay for productive investment in new capital.
  - pphysch 5y ago
    > Also, every legitimate economist states that measuring trade policy by the size of the goods deficit is probably not a passing grade in a basic economics class. Do you have any clue what you’re talking about? The neoclassical/neoliberal economists deemed "legitimate" in USA over the past 50 years are worse than useless. The Summerses and Krugmans helped architect, or at least apologize for, the ongoing American Nightmare. This is the problem! > In other words, money flowing out to pay for imports flows back in to help pay for productive investment in new capital. What is one example of "productive investment", emphasis on productive (i.e. not just FIRE speculation/rent-seeking), that the Chinese are making in America, and at what scale?
    - trevorboaconstr 5y ago

pphysch 5y ago

GDP(PPP) simply isn't an accurate measure of real economic productivity, of producing real things that satisfy various human needs. Despite being the #1 GDP, America has an unbelievably huge trade deficit, unlike Germany and China which have substantial surpluses. This is because American GDP is massively inflated by unproductive/destructive sectors like FIRE and military. For example, how does "imputed rent" have anything to do with economic productivity?

trevorboaconstr 5y ago
So, you’re saying, you have a better and most trusted method of measuring productivity, than the CB, WTO, WB, and OCED. Would you let me know what metric you use, then? Also, every legitimate economist states that measuring trade policy by the size of the goods deficit is probably not a passing grade in a basic economics class. Do you have any clue what you’re talking about? “Deficit” in the term “trade deficit” is not analogous to a deficit in personal or business finance. Trade deficits are always offset by capital inflows. A trade deficit with a financial account surplus does not necessarily mean that the U.S. is over-consuming in the present and under-investing for the future. When a trade deficit’s offsetting inflow of foreign capital goes toward government debt, it increases U.S. productivity by freeing capital for private investment. A country like the U.S. runs an annual trade deficit with a partner country when Americans buy more goods and services from the partner than they sell to it. As a result, money flows out of the U.S. to the country, which sounds bad. But that’s not the end of the story. Those foreigners with the trade surplus – let’s say in China – now have extra saving that needs to be put to work. A lack of productive investment opportunities at home means they look to other countries – like the U.S. – to profitably use their money. In other words, money flowing out to pay for imports flows back in to help pay for productive investment in new capital.
- pphysch 5y ago
  > Also, every legitimate economist states that measuring trade policy by the size of the goods deficit is probably not a passing grade in a basic economics class. Do you have any clue what you’re talking about? The neoclassical/neoliberal economists deemed "legitimate" in USA over the past 50 years are worse than useless. The Summerses and Krugmans helped architect, or at least apologize for, the ongoing American Nightmare. This is the problem! > In other words, money flowing out to pay for imports flows back in to help pay for productive investment in new capital. What is one example of "productive investment", emphasis on productive (i.e. not just FIRE speculation/rent-seeking), that the Chinese are making in America, and at what scale?
  - trevorboaconstr 5y ago