3 ms·
FP16 performance is great, but the FP64 performance isn't terribly compelling. Scientific computing is generally FP64.
by ip26 5y ago
FP16 performance is great, but the FP64 performance isn't terribly compelling. Scientific computing is generally FP64.
- shaklee3 5y agoIf you're comparing it to the MI250 you're comparing it to 2 separate chips on a single card. This is fundamentally different and unless you have an ideal workload or have optimized appropriately, it's not going to hit anywhere near the peak FLOPS if you have data movement between chips.