4 ms·
> But a literal translation just becomes the nonsensical "he isn't like that, he is like that". I guess a better translation is "He isn't that, he is like that
by vulcan01 5y ago
> But a literal translation just becomes the nonsensical "he isn't like that, he is like that".
I guess a better translation is "He isn't that, he is like that." But I agree that English doesn't have a distinction between permanent states vs impermanent states in the "to be" verb.