3 ms·
Sounds like you might've had an unusually bad experience. Might've also been the distro; I don't like Ubuntu much myself. :P Maintaining inherited environments
by chousuke 5y ago
Sounds like you might've had an unusually bad experience. Might've also been the distro; I don't like Ubuntu much myself. :P
Maintaining inherited environments is also much more painful than ones you get to design from the ground up. I work with varied environments, and one with ~250 RHEL / CentOS machines has approximately the same level of maintenance burden as another with a dozen or so Ubuntus because the first environment has had configuration management from the beginning and the second is a complete mess that I've slowly tried to reverse-engineer and clean up.
When your change management works, maintaining a dozen servers isn't all that different from maintaining a thousand or more; and the need for change management and automation doesn't really go anywhere even when you don't self-host things.
- nerdyadventurer 5y agoWhat do you suggest as a maintainable distro?
- chousuke 5y agoI like RHEL and derivatives more for servers myself. It's probably just preference, but I find that RHEL-like distros step on my toes less often. In particular, I don't like debconf at all, and Ubuntu pushing snaps everywhere also leaves a bad taste in my mouth.