So... You can only get paid for your opens source via Tea if you pay massive gas fees to make an NFT for every release? Hobby projects with no funding and few u

So... You can only get paid for your opens source via Tea if you pay massive gas fees to make an NFT for every release? Hobby projects with no funding and few users will be blocked from being available on Tea because they can't afford the gas fees to release an NFT? Perhaps the NFT only has to be issued when you update your dependencies? That's only slightly better and still imposes a huge roadblock for new package adoption, even if it's developers have little or no interest in being paid. This seems like a very cynical attempt to take what money is going to larger OpenSource projects and divert it towards making cryptobros more money. Even if all the issues with NFTs and crypto are put aside. I think there serious challenges with the model and how it incentivizes developers if each package doesn't have direct control over how much of their payouts go to each dependency.