Past the marketing, it's all at the very end (though poorly worded): > graph of open source [software] on‐chain creating a map we’ll use to guide value redist

Past the marketing, it's all at the very end (though poorly worded): > graph of open source [software] on‐chain creating a map we’ll use to guide value redistribution... compensated without direct payment Perhaps what they mean to say is.. `tea` facilitates a relationship between payer (commercial user of open source) and payee (open source developer of that software) with a smart contract. So.. replace payment processor and middle-man fees with smart contract and gas fees? That's mildly interesting, but I'm not even aware of a "centralized" version of this if it exists so not sure it's called for.