4 ms·

Throwing my 2 cents my issue is with that >> Lunar can't be built from this repo yet as the source code for the paid features is hidden This is where I feel a

Throwing my 2 cents my issue is with that >> Lunar can't be built from this repo yet as the source code for the paid features is hidden This is where I feel a bit insulted. As long as you have stubs (as you say you will write) for the non-free parts, I can accept the reasoning. But an unbuildable repo is not a repo, in my view. I am not going to argue semantics here but this is the problematic part, for me. I think that after you publish the stubs it can be called an "open source Lite version" - but before that, it's just "unbuildable code taken from your real code"

samatman 5y ago
This is from the MIT license, feel free to swap from most of the others: THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. That includes being able to build it. It's in yelling case for a reason.
- sharikous 5y ago
  That's the law, you're right, I am not denying that. But being able to build something is a courtesy that is important to me.