> If the source code (or at least a significant portion of it) is available under a OSI approved license then it’s Open Source. It's the part in brackets I dis

> If the source code (or at least a significant portion of it) is available under a OSI approved license then it’s Open Source. It's the part in brackets I disagree with... If a significant portion of a piece of software is available under an OSI approved license, then a significant portion of it is open source. It's still wrong to call the product open source, because "the product" includes integral parts that are not open source.