4 ms·
The comparison for the use of 'efficient' is watt and performance to watt. The initial cost is probably double for the Mac Studio, locking in a whole lot of MWh
by wjnc 5y ago
The comparison for the use of 'efficient' is watt and performance to watt. The initial cost is probably double for the Mac Studio, locking in a whole lot of MWh. I see a something like a 60 W difference in average power consumption. So about 15 hours per KWh saved (€ 0,25 per KWh). Say a € 1000 price difference is 60.000 hours of usage. That's nearly 7 years continuous use, or 1500 office weeks or 30 office years.
I hope the future is ARM though. But for general computing, not Apple-specific. Tiny, embedded, silent computers with a low power draw, perhaps with some on the fly computing in the cloud for specific purposes like gaming.