5 ms·
well, this was fun, past tense. analogies compare the ways dissimilar things are similar, not the ways they aren't. this is a thread about selling them and not
by vmception 5y ago
well, this was fun, past tense. analogies compare the ways dissimilar things are similar, not the ways they aren't.
this is a thread about selling them and not asking why people are willing to pay for them. so what you or I need isn't relevant, if you don't want to buy one then don't buy one. if you want to make money, sell one. unless there was some point you were trying to make, in which case there are plenty of sister threads to make that point in.
- unmole 5y agoYou came up with an analogy that doesn't make sense.
- vmception 5y agothe similarity is that they store images for viewing neuro-typical people got it
- unmole 5y agoExcept for the fact that they don't store images and can't display them, sure. I'm probably too thick to understand it. But please keep repeating your bullshit analogy.
- vmception 5y agocan't have it both ways, they either don't [ever] store, or you're too thick NFTs can in-fact store complete binary data and complete vector data. There are some examples and some production projects doing both of those things. But more commonly they typically load a URL to an image, and people prefer that instead of a URL that its on an IPFS URI, but people accept an IPFS proxy URL. In all scenarios, a separate technology/viewer/website is used to access the standard method which returns the data to be interpreted. Which is where things are dissimilar. Analogies don't compare aspects that are dissimilar [0]. Any one similarity satisfies the criteria for an analogy. [0] - https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/analogy https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/analogy