4 ms·
Dunno enough about the situation in Australia to even pretend, but I imagine it could work if there is a coverage mandate plus taxpayer funding going to the car
by sennight 5y ago
Dunno enough about the situation in Australia to even pretend, but I imagine it could work if there is a coverage mandate plus taxpayer funding going to the carriers. In such a scenario it would be basically impossible to not massively overprovision bandwidth in rural areas, and the carriers would have zero incentive to cap data rates (beyond upselling - but there is a limit). Everywhere else though... telecoms are notorious for under provisioning to the point where major news events can result in the network failing under the load of too many people simultaneously wanting to make a call. Wireless took that to the next level. And it isn't simply a hardware issue, if they lease more backhaul capacity than they need - they burn money. So they're highly incentivized to screw with the top 20% of their heavy subscribers everywhere but the middle of nowhere.
- dbetteridge 5y agoSo aus has the NBN which in theory covers everyone through a combination of FTTP, FTTN and high speed, high latency satellite. Unfortunately the NBN organisation itself is a massive boondoggle (see also Australian politics for the last 10+ years) and their idea of 'coverage' often could be beaten handily by a pigeon and some string. So people pay through the nose for alternatives like Telstra mobile broadband or starlink and given the current neoliberal firesale gov I'd say that's an intentional outcome...