> speaking from a position of ignorance of long-term side effects, because the data wasn't yet in. That’s a two-way street (which I don’t think you’re denying)

> speaking from a position of ignorance of long-term side effects, because the data wasn't yet in. That’s a two-way street (which I don’t think you’re denying). In 20 years it may turn out that the shot was worse than the disease.