4 ms·
The claims seem to be similar to what we're facing with NIMBYism in San Francisco, which often seems to be based in Xenophobia. It would be one thing if they w
by bifrost 5y ago
The claims seem to be similar to what we're facing with NIMBYism in San Francisco, which often seems to be based in Xenophobia.
It would be one thing if they were destroying a several hundred year old city but that doesn't seem like its the case.
- jamal-kumar 5y agoI would recommend spending more time in thousands of year old rainforest islands with some of the most pristine coral in the world. That's not xenophobia, it looks like they're dropping a crappy american city on that and making it clearly less inviting to the local's ability to afford living there than anything else I've seen in a while like this. Americans love to do stuff on islands like this which wrecks the coral, they won't stop flushing toilet paper or other stuff like washing all their cosmetics and stearyl alcohol soaps which wreck everything in every reef near where people settle bringing these things. It'll go from some of the world's most pristine intact scenery to trash in no time. It's not a san francisco backyard bruh
- shkkmo 5y agoThat is ridiculous and deeply offensive. I hope you simply aren't familiar with the facts here. (It so, here is a starting point to learn more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-honduras-landrights-garifuna-idUSKCN1LD168 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-honduras-landrights-garif...) It is not "NIMBYism" when people complain that land which they own is sold without their consent. When those people are a poor ethnic group with indigenous history on the land that is being taken away, often with force, to be sold to rich people of another ethnicity, we have moved so far away from ”NIMBYism" that we passed all the way through "gentrification" and are starting to approach "ethnic cleansing".