> I don't understand the "first speaker" problem Ken talks about it in depth. Is there a part in there where he loses you? (by which I mean: a part where you'r

> I don't understand the "first speaker" problem Ken talks about it in depth. Is there a part in there where he loses you? (by which I mean: a part where you're understanding it, and then in the next part you're not). I might be able to help you get your head around it.