tbh it is a reassuringly weak response. Mostly picking apart logical inconsistencies in the language and / or re-emphasising the already disclosed info. Does n

tbh it is a reassuringly weak response. Mostly picking apart logical inconsistencies in the language and / or re-emphasising the already disclosed info. Does not seem like they were able to produce any hard collateral to contradict anything Okta stated which probably means it's at least ball park accurate.