Written, async interviews give candidates who are better at the job an advantage from those who are just better at schmoozing and exaggerating their resume. So

Written, async interviews give candidates who are better at the job an advantage from those who are just better at schmoozing and exaggerating their resume. So a C+ for effort, but this is a great example of what NOT to do. 1- This is hiring by committee. They sent out a call for questions to a bunch of people and then didn't curate it. Everyone's question get in 2- Too long for the candidate. The best candidates will bail. Companies targeting ~10 minutes on a phone get great response rates 3- Too long for hiring committee. NOBODY is going to read this for most candidates. The reasons resumes win is because they're short for the hiring team, not because they're high-signal So shorter and more-curated wins