3 ms·
It's baffling that a public health institution would discredit themselves so obviously in this way. I don't understand the world that these people live in. It'
by throwaway22032 5y ago
It's baffling that a public health institution would discredit themselves so obviously in this way.
I don't understand the world that these people live in. It's like they don't understand the concept of trust _at all_, they're a few iterations of doubling down on just going into some sort of echochamber nonsense.
The headline isn't even true in the superlative sense (e.g. maybe it spares the odd person, but we make a reasonable allowance for that in colloquial speech.). It's in fact the case that it spares the vast majority - most of us have zero detectable symptoms, both during infection and after the fact.
- everybodyknows 5y ago> It's baffling that a public health institution would discredit themselves so obviously ... Here's your proximate cause: The article's author is "director of public relations and marketing". This may go some way toward explaining why there's no link to the actual research document in the article.