3 ms·
It's an interesting world we live in if the word of an organization that earns a living by stealing data and extorting companies is trusted more than the word o
by Johnny555 5y ago
It's an interesting world we live in if the word of an organization that earns a living by stealing data and extorting companies is trusted more than the word of a public company.
- MrStonedOne 5y ago
- lnxg33k1 5y agoI would say it's more about what each entity has at stake, the public company could be read as "An entity which sold something that didn't have the capability to offer and has a lot to lose if the issues are uncovered" Against "Someone that what has to lose at this point?"
- Johnny555 5y ago"Someone that what has to lose at this point?" What to lose? Their reputation? Both sides have incentive to stretch the facts. But Okta has more accountability since if an Okta customer comes forward and says "We had credentials of several of our users maliciously reset during that time period and have the logs to prove it", then Okta is going to have a hard time of it. If Okta comes up with proof that Lapsus didn't have the access they said they did, Lapsus is not going to have many "customers" complaining "you didn't crime that other company as much as you said you did"