3 ms·
1. Large amounts of wealth entering or leaving a community is a material change in the conditions of the community. 2. Communities have the right to a say abou
by closeparen 5y ago
1. Large amounts of wealth entering or leaving a community is a material change in the conditions of the community.
2. Communities have the right to a say about material changes that affect them, and to block changes whose effects they see as not in their interests. (I disagree with this part).
3. Therefore, it is unfortunate that people with money are able to enter and leave communities as a unilateral, personal spending decision.
4. It is especially bad when government policy tends to amplify, rather than blunt, the ill effects of these decisions on the poorer people who are affected by them. As policy amplified white flight through the interstate highway system and redlining, or gentrification through slum clearance and urban renewal.
- Dracophoenix 5y agoPoint #1 is what comes with freedom of movement. Rich or poor, no one should be stopped from settling or removing himself to wherever he pleases so long as he has the means to pay for it. Point #3 undermines Point #2. Buying a home anywhere is a personal and unilateral spending decision. And when a sufficient number of people buy homes in a particular area, that becomes the "community". With Point #4, I agree government exacerbates the issue. However it does so through regulations. Redlining aside, what you've listed are the consequences of those regulations.