3 ms·
I don't think anyone is overlooking the reasons why one might have more downtime than the other. The problem is that ultimately the downtime itself matters and
by Nextgrid 5y ago
I don't think anyone is overlooking the reasons why one might have more downtime than the other.
The problem is that ultimately the downtime itself matters and not the reason, and if you don't need any of the features that GitHub offers, then the self-hosted route is a better option.
- falcolas 5y ago> if you don't need any of the features that GitHub offers In particular, all of the new features whose addition causes instability.
- Nextgrid 5y agoI think it's the development process (as in moving things around and potentially introducing bugs) than the new features per-se.
- falcolas 5y agoWith all due respect to the developers, it would not speak well for GitHub if they can't maintain stability while refactoring. There's a lot of testing processes and CI processes explicitly around making those actions safe. New features breaking is a lot more understandable - even expected - than regressions and refactoring failures.