It’s mind boggling that they don’t have some filter words that automatically flag an ad as potentially higher-risk for a policy violation and so require human r

It’s mind boggling that they don’t have some filter words that automatically flag an ad as potentially higher-risk for a policy violation and so require human review. Like the word “kill”, for example, seems like a word that should be flagged and yet according to the article it was approved. It doesn’t have to be all-or-nothing. I’m sure Facebook has plenty of intelligent people who are more than capable of creating a risk-based review process that balances the effort vs the outcome better than whatever they’re currently doing.