I precisely gave the example of Krugman, who won a important prize. If they would give the Nobel of Medicine to Dr. Oz, without much general commotion from oth

I precisely gave the example of Krugman, who won a important prize. If they would give the Nobel of Medicine to Dr. Oz, without much general commotion from other doctors: I would for sure consider Medicine a quack, or at least 90% of it, which is the one I use. Now the questions is, are 90% of economists more close to Doctors or to astrologers? If most of economist are quackers and I cannot distinguish them, and most of the quackers end up in Government positions and Universities: economy is quackery!