This article seems to be purposefully conflating social dynamics (increased social accountability for previously acceptable 'neutral' actions) with the embrace

This article seems to be purposefully conflating social dynamics (increased social accountability for previously acceptable 'neutral' actions) with the embrace of valid, structural criticisms of the legal system in this country and their increasing acceptance as "obvious" in legal academia. It feels, at best, like it's purposefully conflating these things so it can discredit those criticisms. It is not a good article.