>Tesla probably has the lead on average but can't (or won't) guarantee that their system is safe in a specific set of best case conditions. Do people not see h

>Tesla probably has the lead on average but can't (or won't) guarantee that their system is safe in a specific set of best case conditions. Do people not see how much of a nightmare it would be if liability is constantly switching back and forth depending on the circumstances the self-driving system is being used under? The only practical approach is to either have the driver always be responsibile when the system is on or the manufacturer always be responsible when the system is on. The choice to use the latter approach means the system has to be limited to very narrow circumstances. That doesn't mean the system is necessarily safer than the competitors in those circumstances, it simply means that the companies are approaching the same problem from differenct angles.