3 ms·
I think that has more to do with DXGKRNL coming from Microsoft than any policy that would be applied to other contributers.
by monocasa 5y ago
I think that has more to do with DXGKRNL coming from Microsoft than any policy that would be applied to other contributers.
- detaro 5y agoOther Microsoft contributions got into the kernel just fine.
- monocasa 5y agoAnd other thin veneers over closed source paravirtualized VM graphics acceleration pipes get in as well, even from companies that flagrantly violate Linux's license. I think that it's a difference of subtree maintainer as to why some Microsoft code gets in and some is fought tooth and nail; you can't treat Linux developers as a monolith, and the graphics side is significantly more Microsoft adverse.