3 ms·
Given how ridiculously strict the Linux folks are being with the DXGKRNL stuff that MS is working on (which is public as part of WSLg), I would say definitely n
by rstat1 5y ago
Given how ridiculously strict the Linux folks are being with the DXGKRNL stuff that MS is working on (which is public as part of WSLg), I would say definitely not.
- monocasa 5y agoI think that has more to do with DXGKRNL coming from Microsoft than any policy that would be applied to other contributers.
- detaro 5y agoOther Microsoft contributions got into the kernel just fine.
- monocasa 5y agoAnd other thin veneers over closed source paravirtualized VM graphics acceleration pipes get in as well, even from companies that flagrantly violate Linux's license. I think that it's a difference of subtree maintainer as to why some Microsoft code gets in and some is fought tooth and nail; you can't treat Linux developers as a monolith, and the graphics side is significantly more Microsoft adverse.