3 ms·
But that sounds like a problem with the welfare system. People should have enough money to pay for power and gas. I don't see the use in mixing up utilities and
by verve_rat 5y ago
But that sounds like a problem with the welfare system. People should have enough money to pay for power and gas. I don't see the use in mixing up utilities and welfare.
Don't get angry at the power company, get angry at the government.
- xxpor 5y agoThe company in this case is owned by the government so it's all the same thing. The actual logistics would change if it weren't, I agree.
- worik 5y agoYes. But the power company (be it government owned or private) is at a "commanding height". It is almost impossible to exist without their service so they have very large social responsibilities. Far larger than the responsibility to their shareholders.