3 ms·
> there’s clearly some agenda here I have to agree a little bit. Moreover, I'm also going to be a bit insensitive here as this particular person, as shown in
by yumraj 5y ago
> there’s clearly some agenda here
I have to agree a little bit.
Moreover, I'm also going to be a bit insensitive here as this particular person, as shown in the photo supposedly has 2 kids already, and is now on a maternity leave (as mentioned in the article) for the 3rd kid (assuming no twins), while she is unable to pay for utility.
Should she be really having another kid while hoping for the state to help/bailout via subsidies? Where does personal responsibility fall into all of this?
- Justsignedup 5y agoTypically I find that people who argue for these very harsh penalties for being poor also argue against easy access to contraception / abortion. So not sure. But it is a valid argument, if you can barely afford to live, why make it even more expensive to live?
- giraffe_lady 5y agoIt falls directly onto the necks of those children where it was always intended to go.
- johnny22 5y agoconsidering everybody is talking about the decline of births, shouldn't we be paying her more? I don't know if that's a serious question or not, but somebody's gotta square the difference.