3 ms·
He was upset that FB has content only in one direction, anti-Russia. I said this is not true and I am expecting a lot of ani-Russia, anti-Putin content to exist
by simion314 5y ago
He was upset that FB has content only in one direction, anti-Russia. I said this is not true and I am expecting a lot of ani-Russia, anti-Putin content to exist on FB, but don't pretend that this is only one sided.
Anyway , weird Putin coward and did not unplug the Internet yet, they were testing this in the past so I am wondering why still keep it, young Russian have access to the truth and this is a big danger for the war-criminal
- freedomben 5y ago> He was upset that FB has content only in one direction, anti-Russia. Where did you get that? The entirety of the post I saw was: > Facebook allowing targeted calls for violence to one side of a conflict only had a lot to do with this decision. Can you point to the part where they get upset, or otherwise makes a value judgment at all?
- HKH2 5y ago> He was upset that FB has content only in one direction, anti-Russia. What makes you think the OP is upset? It seems like a neutral argument to me. Did the OP edit their post?
- simion314 5y agoI might have misinterpreted the comment, now is flagged, would be a good idea if OP learns to be more clear and what he means and maybe link to the event he is refering rather then assume everyone will understand his allusions. Someone linked something so I am reading that now.
- imwillofficial 5y agoI was exceedingly clear and neutral. Your own emotion read into words that were not there. I simply stated a fact and offered no judgement on the merits of the action.