3 ms·
>Microsoft has a tick tock approach to consumer OS releases Nice idea but it just doesn't fit. Windows 95/98/Me were all poor. XP was widely panned when it c
by tonyedgecombe 5y ago
>Microsoft has a tick tock approach to consumer OS releases
Nice idea but it just doesn't fit.
Windows 95/98/Me were all poor.
XP was widely panned when it came out because existing hardware wasn't quite good enough and it was riddled with security issues. Rememebr SP2?
Where did 8.1 go?
Windows 10 is full of the stuff people are complaining about in this thread.
- lproven 5y agoI disagree. 95 good. 98 bad. 2000 good, XP bad (for me), Vista bad, 7 good, 8 bad, 8.1 better but not great, 10 OK, 11 bad. As always: https://www.badscience.net/wp-content/uploads/complicatedcover154.jpg https://www.badscience.net/wp-content/uploads/complicatedcov... ("I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that." -- Ben Goldacre)