5 ms·
> -30,000 feet per minute Isn't that 548km/h (340mph) and faster than terminal velocity? Nose would be pointed down.
by procombo 5y ago
> -30,000 feet per minute
Isn't that 548km/h (340mph) and faster than terminal velocity? Nose would be pointed down.
- chinathrow 5y agoNose was pointed down according to some security cam footage (unverified). https://twitter.com/ChinaAvReview/status/1505834279275999236 https://twitter.com/ChinaAvReview/status/1505834279275999236
- News-Dog 5y ago>terminal velocity? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_velocity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_velocity
- News-Dog 5y agoIf you read the ^^ wikipedia page, you will see the NASA 'Terminal Velocity' url complete with Calculator; https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/termv.html https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/termv.html
- taneq 5y agoTerminal velocity depends on the object. The terminal velocity of a skydiver is around 200km/h. I'd imagine the terminal velocity of an airliner pointed straight down would be significantly higher even without the engines running. With engines at cruising power they move 700km/h+ in horizontal flight, I'd imagine they could exceed that by a lot in a vertical dive.
- belter 5y agoNASA has this online Terminal Velocity calculator. For drag coeficient typical values for commercial large planes are in the order of 0.05. "Terminal Velocity Calculator": https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/termv.html https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/termv.html
- taneq 5y agoBest rough figure I could find for weight of a loaded 737 is around 40 tons, frontal area I'm guesstimating is roughly a 3m diameter cylinder plus ~0.5m average thickness of the 28m wingspan giving 21m^2? For which the calculator gives 262.8m/s or 943.2km/h.
- belter 5y agoNot far from current preliminary estimates. "China Plane Was Travelling At Speed Of Sound As It Slammed Into Hill": https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/china-jets-fatal-dive-took-it-near-speed-of-sound-before-crash-2837720 https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/china-jets-fatal-dive-took-i... "The Boeing Co. 737-800 was knifing through the air at more than 640 miles (966 kilometers) per hour, and at times may have exceeded 700 mph, according to data from Flightradar24, a website that tracks planes. "The preliminary data indicate it was near the speed of sound," said John Hansman, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology astronautics and aeronautics professor who reviewed Bloomberg's calculation of the jet's speed. "It was coming down steep.""