> That’s a nonsensical number from some clickbait article. Here are three sources: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-36320744 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-36320

> That’s a nonsensical number from some clickbait article. Here are three sources: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-36320744 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-36320744 https://www.businessinsider.com/worlds-deadliest-animals-2016-9?r=US&IR=T https://www.businessinsider.com/worlds-deadliest-animals-201... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_deadliest_animals_to_humans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_deadliest_animals_to_h... > The 4.5 million bites (not individuals bit) is a discredited number Care to provide a source? I provided mine but all you came in with is conjecture. In fact here is the stat again straight from the American Vetrinary Medicine Association. https://www.avma.org/resources-tools/pet-owners/dog-bite-prevention https://www.avma.org/resources-tools/pet-owners/dog-bite-pre...