3 ms·
Looking back, it's very interesting to see the narrative building, and lies that existed back then. For example, the great efforts and lengths gone to whitewas
by ipspam 5y ago
Looking back, it's very interesting to see the narrative building, and lies that existed back then.
For example, the great efforts and lengths gone to whitewash Chinese actions.
"Shi Zhengli, PhD, director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) lab in China relatively close (25 to 35 kilometers [15 to 22 miles]) to the Wuhan live-animal market at the epicenter of China's outbreak, has extensively published the genetic sequences of isolates from the bat coronaviruses she studies.
None of them match those of COVID-19, Andersen said, something Shi herself confirmed in a recent interview in Scientific American. "If she would have published a sequence for the virus and then this pops up, then we would have known it came from the lab," Andersen said. "There's no evidence for this, but there is plenty of evidence against it.""
Except we now know they never published all the sequences, and they aren't available to this day.
That was a straight up lie. A purposeful lie