3 ms·
Encyclopedia content has to be neutral. But as a whole Wikipedia is not "neutral". We're pretty strongly in favour of free licenses (Creative Commons etc.), ope
by tommorris 15y ago
Encyclopedia content has to be neutral. But as a whole Wikipedia is not "neutral". We're pretty strongly in favour of free licenses (Creative Commons etc.), open source, access to free knowledge and against censorship. Hence why we don't like crappy laws like this.
As Mike Godwin (of Godwin's Law fame) said:
"I'd also like to +1 the thought that the very existence of Wikipedia is not itself NPOV -- it reflects a philosophical and political position, and one that just about all of us here agree with."
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2011-October/069290.html http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2011-Octob...