3 ms·
Given that Apple devices already have 2-3x premium, as long as Apple absorbs the extra cost, people would be fine with it. This is also why the approach is an
by rfoo 5y ago
Given that Apple devices already have 2-3x premium, as long as Apple absorbs the extra cost, people would be fine with it.
This is also why the approach is an "Apple-only" one.
- olliej 5y agoThe whole point of the M1 debate is that they aren’t 2-3x the price though.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- Maursault 5y ago> Given that Apple devices already have 2-3x premium You're suggesting Apple devices cost between two and three times as much as the competition? I'd like to see that competition, so please show us those $280 Mac Mini and iPhone 13 Mini killers. Or, conversely, show us a superior device for the same price. Remember to match point for point all features of whatever Apple device you somehow believe costs 2-3x as much as it's third party clone.