4 ms·

I actually don't understand what people love about BC. The only thing I find it extremely useful for is the occasional files where inline diffs are practically

I actually don't understand what people love about BC. The only thing I find it extremely useful for is the occasional files where inline diffs are practically mandatory, like CSVs. Other than that, I generally find it frustrating compared to TortoiseGitMerge, except perhaps for some very specific/unusual scenarios. In particular the line highlighting is annoying - instead of coloring the lines that were added vs. removed differently, it colors lines according to whether they're an "important difference" or "unimportant difference" (?!), which is borderline useless to me. What do people love about it so much?

olvy0 5y ago
+1 for TortoiseGitMerge, which is my go-to tool these days. It's Windows only but not a problem for me since I mostly work in Windows. My SO adores Meld, but she works with Linux. I tried using it but couldn't get used to it. She also makes fun of me (half in jest) because I use Tortoise Git instead of the command line...
- tigerlily 5y ago
  I use TortoiseGit too, ever since I used TortoiseSVN back in the day. Highly underrated, and ridiculously powerful, I’ve practically never had to look up “how to do x” :)
larschdk 5y ago
The things that makes it borderline useless to you is actually one reason I like it so much. Makes it really easy to do code reviews and focus on what actually matters. Also, it was until somewhat recently the undisputed best 3-way merge tool. Meld gets close, but to me Meld's UI is sluggish and fuzzy (on Windows) while BC is snappy and sharp.
- dataflow 5y ago
  Maybe I need to try Meld at some point. Have you tried TortoiseGitDiff by any chance?
memsom 5y ago
I’ve been using BC since the early 2000’s, so probably more than 15 years. I know it backwards and forwards. If you set it up right, it is pretty powerful. It allows a lot of the stuff that other tools fail on to be overcome. Manual alignment is a dream. The rules based comparison is very nice. Ignoring unimportant differences removes pretty much all the white space differences. The ease of selecting arbitrary blocks and moving them left or right is powerful. I’ve tried both Windiff and kdiff3 and both have missing features. Back before git, it was common to take a massive set of changes and merge them manually when merging branches, and BC was the only tool that made it painless for me. I stumped up my own cash for a pro license and I use it almost daily even now.
- dataflow 5y ago
  Interesting. Have you tried TortoiseGitDiff? I'd be curious what you think of that in comparison if so. Update: I just downloaded Meld. It literally takes ~half a second to change the cursor location when I click in a highlighted region, which is already making me dislike it. Is this normal?
- cecilpl2 5y ago
  I'll add the ability to specify and tag regexes ("comment", "timestamp", etc) on a file-type by file-type basis, and then specify various tags as "unimportant" for the current diff is super powerful. It means you can do things like compare two system logs from different times and have it highlight you exactly the differences you care about.
7kmph 5y ago
And the theme is unusable on KDE dark theme to a red blue color blinded user.

olvy0 5y ago

+1 for TortoiseGitMerge, which is my go-to tool these days. It's Windows only but not a problem for me since I mostly work in Windows. My SO adores Meld, but she works with Linux. I tried using it but couldn't get used to it. She also makes fun of me (half in jest) because I use Tortoise Git instead of the command line...

tigerlily 5y ago
I use TortoiseGit too, ever since I used TortoiseSVN back in the day. Highly underrated, and ridiculously powerful, I’ve practically never had to look up “how to do x” :)

larschdk 5y ago

The things that makes it borderline useless to you is actually one reason I like it so much. Makes it really easy to do code reviews and focus on what actually matters. Also, it was until somewhat recently the undisputed best 3-way merge tool. Meld gets close, but to me Meld's UI is sluggish and fuzzy (on Windows) while BC is snappy and sharp.

dataflow 5y ago
Maybe I need to try Meld at some point. Have you tried TortoiseGitDiff by any chance?

memsom 5y ago

I’ve been using BC since the early 2000’s, so probably more than 15 years. I know it backwards and forwards. If you set it up right, it is pretty powerful. It allows a lot of the stuff that other tools fail on to be overcome. Manual alignment is a dream. The rules based comparison is very nice. Ignoring unimportant differences removes pretty much all the white space differences. The ease of selecting arbitrary blocks and moving them left or right is powerful. I’ve tried both Windiff and kdiff3 and both have missing features. Back before git, it was common to take a massive set of changes and merge them manually when merging branches, and BC was the only tool that made it painless for me. I stumped up my own cash for a pro license and I use it almost daily even now.

dataflow 5y ago
Interesting. Have you tried TortoiseGitDiff? I'd be curious what you think of that in comparison if so. Update: I just downloaded Meld. It literally takes ~half a second to change the cursor location when I click in a highlighted region, which is already making me dislike it. Is this normal?
cecilpl2 5y ago
I'll add the ability to specify and tag regexes ("comment", "timestamp", etc) on a file-type by file-type basis, and then specify various tags as "unimportant" for the current diff is super powerful. It means you can do things like compare two system logs from different times and have it highlight you exactly the differences you care about.

7kmph 5y ago

And the theme is unusable on KDE dark theme to a red blue color blinded user.