4 ms·
That is also egregious, but Apple and Google are getting away with it because they have a duopoly over mobile phone app stores. Not so with video hosting.
by humanistbot 5y ago
That is also egregious, but Apple and Google are getting away with it because they have a duopoly over mobile phone app stores. Not so with video hosting.
- hallway_monitor 5y agoIsn't it so though? What viable alternatives exist?
- johnnyanmac 5y agoDefinitely educate me, but: what is Vimeo doing for a B2B solution that Youtube can't provide? You can provide unlisted videos (and that is something a few pareon users have done). It's odd because Vimeo was most known to me for hosting art portfolios, so seeing it denounce it's "indie" status is bewildering. I assume the advantage comes from providing uncompressed videos with extremely high bitrate. Which is an admittedly extremely niche market.
- eigen 5y agoan alternative is Amazon Video Direct where content providers receive 50% of net revenue. seems like a worse deal than Apple & Google. https://videodirect.amazon.com/home/help?topicId=G202037410&ref_=avd_sup_G202037410 https://videodirect.amazon.com/home/help?topicId=G202037410&...